# Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 33/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 144 | 24 053 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +775 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 82/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.

temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.

If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

temporal is growing faster right now (+775 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana](https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana-vs-temporal