# Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana vs Tailscale

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | Tailscale |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 33/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 144 | 38 245 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 440 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 14 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.104.4 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | — | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Tailscale scores 84/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.

Tailscale ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.

If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; Tailscale needs more configuration.

Tailscale is growing faster right now (+1 440 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana](https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana.md)
- [Tailscale](https://selfhost.directory/project/tailscale) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tailscale.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana-vs-tailscale