# Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 33/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 144 | 95 273 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 311 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 25 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.

If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; Stirling-PDF needs more configuration.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 311 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana](https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana-vs-stirling-pdf