# Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana vs SRS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | SRS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 33/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 144 | 29 390 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +111 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

SRS scores 78/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.

SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.

If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; SRS needs more configuration.

SRS is growing faster right now (+111 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana](https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana.md)
- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana-vs-srs