# Speedarr vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Speedarr | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 0/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #34 of 34 in Network Management | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 24 | 2 260 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v2026.09.21 · 21 Sept 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 0/100 for Speedarr, so it is the safer default.

Speedarr ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

If you want the quickest setup, Speedarr is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Speedarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/speedarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speedarr.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/speedarr-vs-windows-arm