# Speedarr vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Speedarr | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 0/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #34 of 34 in Network Management | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 24 | 24 057 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +779 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v2026.09.21 · 21 Sept 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 82/100 against 0/100 for Speedarr, so it is the safer default.

Speedarr ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.

If you want the quickest setup, Speedarr is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

temporal is growing faster right now (+779 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Speedarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/speedarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speedarr.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/speedarr-vs-temporal