# speech-to-phrase vs Zulip

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | speech-to-phrase | Zulip |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 11 in Voice Assistants | #1 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 348 | 26 133 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +190 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.4.3 · 3 Apr 2026 | 12.3 · 21 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Zulip scores 82/100 against 46/100 for speech-to-phrase, so it is the safer default.

Zulip ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for speech-to-phrase.

If you want the quickest setup, Zulip is easier to run; speech-to-phrase needs more configuration.

Zulip is growing faster right now (+190 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [speech-to-phrase](https://selfhost.directory/project/speech-to-phrase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speech-to-phrase.md)
- [Zulip](https://selfhost.directory/project/zulip) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zulip.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Discourse vs Zulip](https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-zulip)
- [Rocket.Chat vs Zulip](https://selfhost.directory/compare/rocketchat-vs-zulip)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/speech-to-phrase-vs-zulip