# speech-to-phrase vs Typst

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | speech-to-phrase | Typst |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 11 in Voice Assistants | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 348 | 56 869 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +140 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.4.3 · 3 Apr 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Typst scores 82/100 against 46/100 for speech-to-phrase, so it is the safer default.

Typst ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for speech-to-phrase.

If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; speech-to-phrase needs more configuration.

Typst is growing faster right now (+140 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [speech-to-phrase](https://selfhost.directory/project/speech-to-phrase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speech-to-phrase.md)
- [Typst](https://selfhost.directory/project/typst) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typst.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/speech-to-phrase-vs-typst