speech-to-phrasevsTypesense
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| speech-to-phrase | Typesense | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 11 in Voice Assistants | #6 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 348 | 27 064 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +471 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.4.3 · 3 Apr 2026 | v30.2 · 19 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
Typesense scores 79/100 against 46/100 for speech-to-phrase, so it is the safer default.
Typesense ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for speech-to-phrase.
If you want the quickest setup, Typesense is easier to run; speech-to-phrase needs more configuration.
Typesense is growing faster right now (+471 stars in 30 days).
speech-to-phrase details →Typesense details →
Swap a project
Keep speech-to-phrase, compare it with
Keep Typesense, compare it with