# speech-to-phrase vs Traefik

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | speech-to-phrase | Traefik |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 11 in Voice Assistants | #1 of 24 in Reverse Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 348 | 65 402 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +447 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.4.3 · 3 Apr 2026 | v2.11.60 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Traefik scores 86/100 against 46/100 for speech-to-phrase, so it is the safer default.

Traefik ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for speech-to-phrase.

If you want the quickest setup, Traefik is easier to run; speech-to-phrase needs more configuration.

Traefik is growing faster right now (+447 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [speech-to-phrase](https://selfhost.directory/project/speech-to-phrase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speech-to-phrase.md)
- [Traefik](https://selfhost.directory/project/traefik) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/traefik.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Kong vs Traefik](https://selfhost.directory/compare/kong-vs-traefik)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/speech-to-phrase-vs-traefik