speech-to-phrasevsSRS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| speech-to-phrase | SRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 11 in Voice Assistants | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 348 | 29 389 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +112 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 13 |
| Latest release | v1.4.3 · 3 Apr 2026 | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
SRS scores 78/100 against 46/100 for speech-to-phrase, so it is the safer default.
SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for speech-to-phrase.
If you want the quickest setup, SRS is easier to run; speech-to-phrase needs more configuration.
SRS is growing faster right now (+112 stars in 30 days).
speech-to-phrase details →SRS details →
Swap a project
Keep speech-to-phrase, compare it with
Keep SRS, compare it with