# Speakr vs wraft

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Speakr | wraft |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 6 in Transcription | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 4 135 ✓ | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +135 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

Speakr scores 63/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.

wraft ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speakr.

If you want the quickest setup, Speakr is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.

Speakr is growing faster right now (+135 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Speakr](https://selfhost.directory/project/speakr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speakr.md)
- [wraft](https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/speakr-vs-wraft