# Speakr vs WhisperLive---CPU

> Two self-hosted [Transcription projects](https://selfhost.directory/transcription), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Speakr | WhisperLive---CPU |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 6 in Transcription | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 4 135 | 4 337 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +142 ✓ | +45 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

WhisperLive---CPU scores 64/100 against 63/100 for Speakr, so it is the safer default.

WhisperLive---CPU ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speakr.

Speakr is growing faster right now (+142 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Speakr](https://selfhost.directory/project/speakr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speakr.md)
- [WhisperLive---CPU](https://selfhost.directory/project/whisperlive-cpu) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/whisperlive-cpu.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/speakr-vs-whisperlive-cpu