# SparkyFitness vs Zero-K

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SparkyFitness | Zero-K |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 6 503 ✓ | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +392 ✓ | +26 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.10.0 · 29 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Lua |

## Which one should you pick?

SparkyFitness scores 66/100 against 62/100 for Zero-K, so it is the safer default.

SparkyFitness ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zero-K.

If you want the quickest setup, Zero-K is easier to run; SparkyFitness needs more configuration.

SparkyFitness is growing faster right now (+392 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SparkyFitness](https://selfhost.directory/project/sparkyfitness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sparkyfitness.md)
- [Zero-K](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sparkyfitness-vs-zero-k