SparkyFitnessvsworkout_challenge
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SparkyFitness | workout_challenge | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 37/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #26 of 31 in Health & Fitness |
| GitHub stars | 6 502 | 151 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +402 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.9.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | 0.1.6 · 30 Jan 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
SparkyFitness scores 66/100 against 37/100 for workout_challenge, so it is the safer default.
SparkyFitness ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for workout_challenge.
If you want the quickest setup, SparkyFitness is easier to run; workout_challenge needs more configuration.
SparkyFitness is growing faster right now (+402 stars in 30 days).
SparkyFitness details →workout_challenge details →
Swap a project
Keep SparkyFitness, compare it with
Keep workout_challenge, compare it with