# SparkyFitness vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SparkyFitness | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 6 498 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +398 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.9.0 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

SparkyFitness scores 66/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

SparkyFitness ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

If you want the quickest setup, SparkyFitness is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

SparkyFitness is growing faster right now (+398 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SparkyFitness](https://selfhost.directory/project/sparkyfitness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sparkyfitness.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sparkyfitness-vs-windows-arm