# SparkyFitness vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SparkyFitness | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 6 501 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +401 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.9.0 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

SparkyFitness scores 66/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

SparkyFitness ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

SparkyFitness is growing faster right now (+401 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SparkyFitness](https://selfhost.directory/project/sparkyfitness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sparkyfitness.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sparkyfitness-vs-uusec-waf