# SparkyFitness vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SparkyFitness | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 6 504 | 8 552 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +393 ✓ | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.10.0 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 66/100 for SparkyFitness, so it is the safer default.

SparkyFitness ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

If you want the quickest setup, SparkyFitness is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

SparkyFitness is growing faster right now (+393 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SparkyFitness](https://selfhost.directory/project/sparkyfitness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sparkyfitness.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sparkyfitness-vs-tube-archivist