# SparkyFitness vs trigger

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SparkyFitness | trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 6 497 | 16 643 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +397 ✓ | +256 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 | 49 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.9.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

trigger scores 76/100 against 66/100 for SparkyFitness, so it is the safer default.

trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 26 for SparkyFitness.

If you want the quickest setup, SparkyFitness is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.

## Details

- [SparkyFitness](https://selfhost.directory/project/sparkyfitness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sparkyfitness.md)
- [trigger](https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sparkyfitness-vs-trigger