# SparkyFitness vs transfer.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SparkyFitness | transfer.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 6 498 | 15 905 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +398 ✓ | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.9.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

transfer.sh scores 69/100 against 66/100 for SparkyFitness, so it is the safer default.

SparkyFitness ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; SparkyFitness needs more configuration.

SparkyFitness is growing faster right now (+398 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SparkyFitness](https://selfhost.directory/project/sparkyfitness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sparkyfitness.md)
- [transfer.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sparkyfitness-vs-transfersh