SparkyFitnessvsSpeedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SparkyFitness | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 6 503 | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +392 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.10.0 · 29 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
SparkyFitness scores 66/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.
SparkyFitness ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.
If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; SparkyFitness needs more configuration.
SparkyFitness is growing faster right now (+392 stars in 30 days).
SparkyFitness details →Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana details →
Swap a project
Keep SparkyFitness, compare it with
Keep Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, compare it with