SpacetimeDBvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SpacetimeDB | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 38 in Databases | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 25 416 | 6 053 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +94 | +101 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.13.0 · 19 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
SpacetimeDB scores 75/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
SpacetimeDB ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, SpacetimeDB is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
SpacetimeDB details →Zammad details →