# SpacetimeDB vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SpacetimeDB | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 38 in Databases | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 25 407 | 93 050 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +85 | +1 256 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.13.0 · 19 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 75/100 for SpacetimeDB, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for SpacetimeDB.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; SpacetimeDB needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 256 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SpacetimeDB](https://selfhost.directory/project/spacetimedb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/spacetimedb.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/spacetimedb-vs-uptime-kuma