# SpacetimeDB vs trigger

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SpacetimeDB | trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 38 in Databases | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 25 426 ✓ | 16 653 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +104 | +254 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 51 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.13.0 · 19 Oct 2026 | v4.8.2 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

trigger scores 76/100 against 75/100 for SpacetimeDB, so it is the safer default.

trigger ships more often: 51 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for SpacetimeDB.

If you want the quickest setup, SpacetimeDB is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.

trigger is growing faster right now (+254 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SpacetimeDB](https://selfhost.directory/project/spacetimedb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/spacetimedb.md)
- [trigger](https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/spacetimedb-vs-trigger