SpacetimeDBvsTasmota
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SpacetimeDB | Tasmota | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 38 in Databases | #3 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 25 403 | 24 940 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +81 | +167 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 6 |
| Latest release | v2.13.0 · 19 Oct 2026 | v16.0.0 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | C |
Which one should you pick?
Tasmota scores 79/100 against 75/100 for SpacetimeDB, so it is the safer default.
SpacetimeDB ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tasmota.
If you want the quickest setup, SpacetimeDB is easier to run; Tasmota needs more configuration.
Tasmota is growing faster right now (+167 stars in 30 days).
SpacetimeDB details →Tasmota details →