# spacedrive vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | spacedrive | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 34 in File Management | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 39 337 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +310 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

spacedrive scores 70/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for spacedrive.

If you want the quickest setup, spacedrive is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

spacedrive is growing faster right now (+310 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [spacedrive](https://selfhost.directory/project/spacedrive) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/spacedrive.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/spacedrive-vs-windows-arm