# spacedrive vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | spacedrive | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 34 in File Management | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 39 338 ✓ | 8 553 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +311 ✓ | +84 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 70/100 for spacedrive, so it is the safer default.

Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for spacedrive.

If you want the quickest setup, spacedrive is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

spacedrive is growing faster right now (+311 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [spacedrive](https://selfhost.directory/project/spacedrive) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/spacedrive.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/spacedrive-vs-tube-archivist