# SoulSync vs tubesync

> Two self-hosted [Sonarr alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/sonarr), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SoulSync | tubesync |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 59 in Music Streaming | #24 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 321 | 2 809 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +88 ✓ | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 69 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | 3.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.18.5 · 8 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

SoulSync scores 67/100 against 60/100 for tubesync, so it is the safer default.

SoulSync ships more often: 69 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for tubesync.

If you want the quickest setup, tubesync is easier to run; SoulSync needs more configuration.

SoulSync is growing faster right now (+88 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SoulSync](https://selfhost.directory/project/soulsync) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/soulsync.md)
- [tubesync](https://selfhost.directory/project/tubesync) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tubesync.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/soulsync-vs-tubesync