# Sonatype Nexus vs uncompressed

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Sonatype Nexus | uncompressed |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Package Management | #71 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 2 691 ✓ | 213 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | release-3.97.2-02 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.0.0 · 4 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | EPL-1.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Sonatype Nexus scores 64/100 against 47/100 for uncompressed, so it is the safer default.

Sonatype Nexus ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for uncompressed.

If you want the quickest setup, Sonatype Nexus is easier to run; uncompressed needs more configuration.

Sonatype Nexus is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Sonatype Nexus](https://selfhost.directory/project/sonatype-nexus) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sonatype-nexus.md)
- [uncompressed](https://selfhost.directory/project/uncompressed) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uncompressed.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sonatype-nexus-vs-uncompressed