# Sonarr vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Sonarr | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 142 in Media Management | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 17 475 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +978 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v5.0.0.2838 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | C | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Sonarr scores 81/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

Sonarr ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

Sonarr is growing faster right now (+978 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Sonarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarr.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sonarr-vs-uusec-waf