# Sonarr vs ubnt-update

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Sonarr | ubnt-update |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 31/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 142 in Media Management | #31 of 31 in Networking |
| GitHub stars | 17 478 ✓ | 23 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +965 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v5.0.0.2838 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | — |

## Which one should you pick?

Sonarr scores 81/100 against 31/100 for ubnt-update, so it is the safer default.

Sonarr ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ubnt-update.

If you want the quickest setup, Sonarr is easier to run; ubnt-update needs more configuration.

Sonarr is growing faster right now (+965 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Sonarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarr.md)
- [ubnt-update](https://selfhost.directory/project/ubnt-update) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ubnt-update.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sonarr-vs-ubnt-update