# Sonarr vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Sonarr | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 142 in Media Management | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 17 472 | 117 704 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +975 | +5 345 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v5.0.0.2838 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 81/100 for Sonarr, so it is the safer default.

Sonarr ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 345 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Sonarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarr.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sonarr-vs-tradingagents