# SonarQube vs WindowsinDocker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SonarQube | WindowsinDocker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Code Review | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 11 125 | 53 765 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +103 | +370 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.

SonarQube ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for WindowsinDocker.

If you want the quickest setup, WindowsinDocker is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.

WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+370 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SonarQube](https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube.md)
- [WindowsinDocker](https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sonarqube-vs-windowsindocker