# SonarQube vs Typst

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SonarQube | Typst |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Code Review | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 11 125 | 56 874 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +103 | +145 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Typst scores 82/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.

SonarQube ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.

If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.

## Details

- [SonarQube](https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube.md)
- [Typst](https://selfhost.directory/project/typst) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typst.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sonarqube-vs-typst