# SonarQube vs Twenty

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SonarQube | Twenty |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Code Review | #1 of 21 in CRM |
| GitHub stars | 11 122 | 60 029 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +100 | +2 571 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 | twenty/v2.52.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Twenty scores 84/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.

SonarQube ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Twenty.

If you want the quickest setup, Twenty is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.

Twenty is growing faster right now (+2 571 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SonarQube](https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube.md)
- [Twenty](https://selfhost.directory/project/twenty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/twenty.md)

## Related comparisons

- [ERPNext vs Twenty](https://selfhost.directory/compare/erpnext-vs-twenty)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sonarqube-vs-twenty