solidtimevsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| solidtime | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Time Tracking | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 9 056 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +128 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.22.1 · 21 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
solidtime scores 69/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
solidtime ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.
If you want the quickest setup, solidtime is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
solidtime is growing faster right now (+128 stars in 30 days).
solidtime details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep solidtime, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with