solidtimevsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| solidtime | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Time Tracking | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 9 056 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +128 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.22.1 · 21 Oct 2026 | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
solidtime scores 69/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.
solidtime ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.
If you want the quickest setup, solidtime is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
solidtime is growing faster right now (+128 stars in 30 days).
solidtime details →Urbit details →
Swap a project
Keep solidtime, compare it with
Keep Urbit, compare it with