solidtimevsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| solidtime | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Time Tracking | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 9 056 | 47 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +128 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.22.1 · 21 Oct 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 69/100 for solidtime, so it is the safer default.
solidtime ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Text Generation WebUI.
If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; solidtime needs more configuration.
solidtime is growing faster right now (+128 stars in 30 days).
solidtime details →Text Generation WebUI details →
Swap a project
Keep solidtime, compare it with
Keep Text Generation WebUI, compare it with