# social_recipes vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | social_recipes | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #16 of 18 in Recipe Management | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 52 | 8 653 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +154 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.9.10 · 18 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 43/100 for social_recipes, so it is the safer default.

social_recipes ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; social_recipes needs more configuration.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+154 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [social_recipes](https://selfhost.directory/project/socialrecipes) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/socialrecipes.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/socialrecipes-vs-workout-cool