# social_recipes vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | social_recipes | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #16 of 18 in Recipe Management | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 52 | 8 553 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +84 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.9.11 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 43/100 for social_recipes, so it is the safer default.

social_recipes ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

If you want the quickest setup, social_recipes is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+84 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [social_recipes](https://selfhost.directory/project/socialrecipes) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/socialrecipes.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/socialrecipes-vs-tube-archivist