# snibox vs twinny

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | snibox | twinny |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 63/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 6 in Code Management | #16 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 1 812 | 3 684 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v4.0.20 · 22 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

twinny scores 63/100 against 54/100 for snibox, so it is the safer default.

twinny ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for snibox.

snibox is growing faster right now (+1 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [snibox](https://selfhost.directory/project/snibox) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/snibox.md)
- [twinny](https://selfhost.directory/project/twinny) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/twinny.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/snibox-vs-twinny