# snibox vs SonarQube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | snibox | SonarQube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 6 in Code Management | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 1 812 | 11 122 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +102 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

SonarQube scores 71/100 against 54/100 for snibox, so it is the safer default.

SonarQube ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for snibox.

If you want the quickest setup, snibox is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.

SonarQube is growing faster right now (+102 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [snibox](https://selfhost.directory/project/snibox) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/snibox.md)
- [SonarQube](https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/snibox-vs-sonarqube