SnapcastvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Snapcast | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Audio Streaming | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 8 039 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +149 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.35.0 · 10 Mar 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Snapcast scores 72/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Snapcast.
If you want the quickest setup, Snapcast is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
Snapcast is growing faster right now (+149 stars in 30 days).
Snapcast details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep Snapcast, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with