# smart-sec-cam vs Zot Registry

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | smart-sec-cam | Zot Registry |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #29 of 36 in Video Streaming | #3 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 255 | 2 921 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +119 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.1.22 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Zot Registry scores 64/100 against 43/100 for smart-sec-cam, so it is the safer default.

Zot Registry ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for smart-sec-cam.

If you want the quickest setup, Zot Registry is easier to run; smart-sec-cam needs more configuration.

Zot Registry is growing faster right now (+119 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [smart-sec-cam](https://selfhost.directory/project/smart-sec-cam) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/smart-sec-cam.md)
- [Zot Registry](https://selfhost.directory/project/zot-registry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zot-registry.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/smart-sec-cam-vs-zot-registry