# Slipshow vs SRS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Slipshow | SRS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #11 of 38 in Personal Productivity | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 901 | 29 391 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +112 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.13.0 · 5 Sept 2026 | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | OCaml | C |

## Which one should you pick?

SRS scores 78/100 against 52/100 for Slipshow, so it is the safer default.

SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Slipshow.

If you want the quickest setup, Slipshow is easier to run; SRS needs more configuration.

SRS is growing faster right now (+112 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Slipshow](https://selfhost.directory/project/slipshow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/slipshow.md)
- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/slipshow-vs-srs