# Apache SkyWalking vs torqvoice

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache SkyWalking | torqvoice |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #4 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | 24 976 ✓ | 45 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 22 ✓ |
| Latest release | v11.0.0 · 28 Aug 2026 | v1.2.64 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache SkyWalking scores 76/100 against 42/100 for torqvoice, so it is the safer default.

torqvoice ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Apache SkyWalking.

If you want the quickest setup, torqvoice is easier to run; Apache SkyWalking needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Apache SkyWalking](https://selfhost.directory/project/skywalking) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/skywalking.md)
- [torqvoice](https://selfhost.directory/project/torqvoice) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/torqvoice.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/skywalking-vs-torqvoice