# Apache SkyWalking vs tobab

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache SkyWalking | tobab |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 37/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #34 of 40 in Authentication |
| GitHub stars | 24 978 ✓ | 155 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v11.0.0 · 28 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache SkyWalking scores 76/100 against 37/100 for tobab, so it is the safer default.

Apache SkyWalking ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for tobab.

If you want the quickest setup, tobab is easier to run; Apache SkyWalking needs more configuration.

Apache SkyWalking is growing faster right now (+4 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache SkyWalking](https://selfhost.directory/project/skywalking) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/skywalking.md)
- [tobab](https://selfhost.directory/project/tobab) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tobab.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/skywalking-vs-tobab