# Apache SkyWalking vs static_status

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache SkyWalking | static_status |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #24 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 24 978 ✓ | 732 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v11.0.0 · 28 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache SkyWalking scores 76/100 against 50/100 for static_status, so it is the safer default.

Apache SkyWalking ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for static_status.

If you want the quickest setup, static_status is easier to run; Apache SkyWalking needs more configuration.

Apache SkyWalking is growing faster right now (+4 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache SkyWalking](https://selfhost.directory/project/skywalking) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/skywalking.md)
- [static_status](https://selfhost.directory/project/static-status) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/static-status.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/skywalking-vs-static-status