# Single Server vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Single Server | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 11 in Deployment | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 231 | 93 040 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 293 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.2.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 44/100 for Single Server, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Single Server.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Single Server needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 293 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Single Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/singleserver) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/singleserver.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/singleserver-vs-uptime-kuma