# Single Server vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Single Server | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 11 in Deployment | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 231 | 17 184 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.2.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

Upptime scores 69/100 against 44/100 for Single Server, so it is the safer default.

Single Server ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Single Server needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Single Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/singleserver) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/singleserver.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/singleserver-vs-upptime